Evidence and Interpretations of Hastings Over Time Flashcards

1️⃣ Familiarise yourself with the flashcards:

  • Look through all the flashcards to see what's on both sides.
  • Make sure you understand the information on each card. If something's unclear, click the link to the revision notes at the bottom of the page for more details.

2️⃣ Test yourself:

  • Look at the question or prompt on each card and try to remember the answer before flipping it over.
  • Check the answer and make a note of any cards you find challenging and need to go over more.

3️⃣ Consistently Review and Practice:

  • Use spaced repetition: spend more time on the cards you struggle with and go over them more often.
  • Regularly review all the flashcards to help you better understand and retain the information over time.

Note: We may include questions that have multiple correct answers. It's useful to remember specific examples to understand these concepts better.

PERSONALISED 1-TO-1 TUTORING

Need more help on this topic? Get 1-to-1 support

Get support with clear explanations, practice and feedback (Ages 5 to 16).

  • DBS-checked tutors
  • Flexible times
  • Parents can be updated

Want an ad-free experience? Subscribe to remove ads

What is meant by "evidence" for the Battle of Hastings?

Evidence is anything that gives us clues about the battle. It can be writing, pictures, objects, or the shape of the land.

What is a historical "interpretation" of the Battle of Hastings?

An interpretation is someone's explanation of what happened and why. It is based on evidence, but also on the historian's own ideas and time period.

Why is the Bayeux Tapestry an important source for Hastings?

It was made soon after 1066. It is a long stitched picture that shows the events before and during the battle in great detail.

How can the Bayeux Tapestry also be seen as Norman propaganda?

It was probably made for a Norman leader. It praises William, suggests God was on his side, and makes Harold look weak or dishonest.

Give one English and one Norman written source for the Battle of Hastings.

The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle is an English source. William of Poitiers' account is a Norman source.

Why do historians compare English and Norman accounts of Hastings?

Each side wanted to show its own leader as brave and right. By comparing the stories, historians can spot bias and get closer to the truth.

Why is Harold Godwinson's death at Hastings still argued about?

Some sources say he was killed by an arrow in the eye. Others say he was cut down by Norman knights. The Bayeux Tapestry is damaged here, so we cannot be sure.

How do historians use the battlefield site itself as evidence?

They study the slopes, ridges, and flat areas on the hill. They compare this landscape with written accounts to test where troops stood and how the battle was fought.

How has the site at Hastings been used to shape views of the battle over time?

William built Battle Abbey there, which made the site seem holy and justified his rule. Later guidebooks, plaques, and museums have told new versions of the story for visitors.

How do modern films, TV shows, and re-enactments influence interpretations of Hastings?

They turn the battle into a clear, dramatic story that is easy to follow. They can leave out dull or uncertain parts, so people may remember the show more than the real evidence.